Friday, May 23, 2014

BOOKS: Solaris

You'll never look at alien oceans the same again!

Solaris, by Stanislaw Lem

 

    I don't want to relegate these posts to book reviews, per say (because honestly, there's more than enough people doing that, and doing it much better than I ever could, for me to bother attempting a serious review), but more my general thoughts and opinions about the work. I will give no score, but I will indicate my suggestion to read it or not. So, let's begin, shall we?

    Some time back, I was searching the interwebs (or, interwebz) for book recommendations. I've been on a heavy sci-fi kick the last few years, so that's where my searching lead me. I found a few "must read" sci-fi books lists, and this was on one of them (if I could possibly remember where I found it, I'd link to it. It was probably more than a year ago, if not longer). I read the words, "sentient ocean", and I was in. I've been wanting to find this book for a while. My wife and I, a few weekends ago, went to our favorite used books store, called, well, Used Book Superstore (here's a link: http://www.usedbooksuperstore.com/). They used to have five locations in southern NH and Massachusetts. Unfortunately, all but two of the Mass locations remain. However, they are the two best of those five anyway. They always have crazy discounts, and most books are between $1.99-$4.99. Okay, enough advertising for them.
    Anyway, we went to the one in Burlington, Mass, and found nothing. We decided to try the one in Danvers, which is only about twenty minutes away. As I thought I was setting myself up for more disappointment, I saw this: (!!)


    Automatically, a fairly crappy bookstore(s) visit turned into an awesome one. I snatched this up, and I couldn't wait to read it. Finally, last week, I started it. Since my memory is abnormally lousy, I usually have a tough time recalling everything I've read in a book. So I decided I'd keep notes about this book. This decision also made it easy for me to write up these book thoughts.
    I'm a slow reader, but this book is short, and it goes fast. I read it in a week, which is pretty good for my slow ass. Overall, I liked this book. It was imaginative, weird, confusing (more on that in a moment), and thoughtful. It was actually much different than I thought it was going to be. It's not a bunch of scientists just shooting the shit with the ocean for 211 pages (which I thought it might be), it's far different. The sentient alien ocean, which is (most likely) the only creature living on the planet Solaris, doesn't talk in a traditional sense. It doesn't do anything in a traditional sense. It's very difficult for the human scientists to wrap their minds around this thing. It's so alien, very little is known of it. By the end of the book, both the scientists and reader gain little information about exactly how the ocean works. This is fine with me, I enjoy letting my imagination fill in the blanks. Not everything needs an explanation, and some things just don't have an explanation (at least one that can be understood by human minds).
    I'm not going to summarize the book here. Even though it's a short book, my summary would be needlessly long and probably slightly incoherent, as I'm wont to pop in with innumerable parenthetical notes every other sentence. You can find better summaries elsewhere (I'm great at getting people to leave my page), but I'll briefly talk about two chapters that confused me. The first was chapter eight, entitled, "The Monsters". In it, Kelvin (the main character) reads, at length, from a book in the station's library about the ocean, and it's various forms and structures. The basic gist of the chapter is that the ocean, through long, fantastic processes, creates huge, alien structures that line the planet/ocean. They all have strange names like, "mimoid", and, "symmetriad". It was one of the longer chapters in the books, and it dragged a bit. Lots of flowery language and (for me, at least) tough-to-imagine scenarios with alien geography. I suppose you could look at that as further proof as to just how bizarre Solaris, and it's inhabitant ocean, is, but I find it just a bit annoying.
    This book has lots of chapters where Kelvin reads books and disseminates info from them to the reader. The other chapter that I had a hard(ish) time following was chapter eleven, "The Thinkers". This one has Kelvin reading more books/pamphlets from the library. This time, they are about so-called, "Solarists", or people who closely follow/study the happenings of the strange planet. It goes through several theories that scientists throughout the ages have had about Solaris, and it just becomes too much. It gets boring, and it's a dry read. I found myself reading without really absorbing. Almost reading for the sake of getting through, to the next chapter.
    Other than those two chapters, the rest of the book was a delight. It makes you think about life other than human life. It makes you think about how much we just don't know about literally everything, besides ourselves and human life. And even that, we aren't too sure of. I'm interested in reading more from Mr. Lem, and hopefully I have an easier time locating them than I did with Solaris.

I'd recommend this book. Just pay attention when you read some of the info-heavy chapters. 

 

Tuesday, May 20, 2014

Evolution!

And it didn't even take tens of thousands of years!

    Okay, guys and gals. We've come to a crossroads of sorts. When I first conceived of this blog, it was going to be strictly about boss battles. And since Dark Souls II had just come out, and since those games (in general) have amazing boss battles, I figured what a great place to start. After finishing the game, I was stuck. What game could I go to next that had great bosses that I could write about? Nothing much came to mind (besides the first two Souls games). Then I thought of the God Of War series. Now that's a series that has great boss battles. But, I've beaten all but the most recent game (Ascension). While I would like to go back and replay those games, I have such a gigantic backlog of games (from NES up to PS3) that I decided it was time to start playing through them. I figured, perhaps I could take pictures, and document my blind progress through all these games. Original? Certainly not. But perhaps I could bring a slightly different perspective? Maybe people like my inane ramblings?
    I'll take pictures also, and I'd like to take this space here to apologize, once and for all, for the quality of the pictures. As this is still largely just a service to myself (I'm my target audience at this point, because I'm not convinced, despite the page view numbers, that more than one or two people really even look at this. Thanks spambots!), I don't have the money nor justification to buy that fancy capturing hard/software. I would like it, because I'm sure it makes things much easier, but that's likely not happening. I'll try to take the best pics I can with my phone, and use those. Who knows, if people actually like reading what I write, maybe I can save and splurge on a capture device.
    So, that's that. Going forward, the video game section of this here blog will be my documentations of playing through these games, with an emphasis on bosses, where applicable.
    Wait, video game section? Isn't it ALL video games, you might ask yourself. The short answer is

NO!!

 

    Now, for the long answer. Another passion of mine is reading. After a long drought of non-reading, I'm getting back into it. I've decided I'm going to post my thoughts on what I'm reading. Not reviews, let's say (overdone, eh?), but just my general thoughts and opinions. Now, this may be interesting for the following reason: I'm blind and can't read books* I'm not really smart. I mean, I'm not an idiot, but when it comes to reading and interpreting what I read, well, I'm bad. My imagination has a very difficult time sometimes putting the words on the page into coherent images in my mind. As I read mostly sci-fi, this is sort of problematic. Perhaps with my writings here, I can do two things: help myself figure out/remember things I've read, and let other people know that it's okay not to understand everything you read. You don't need to be an English teacher to appreciate a book. If you read a book, and then you read the reviews of said book, and all you find are people arguing the many enlightened themes of said book, and you say to yourself, "I thought it was just about a planet full of monkeys?", well, then know you are not alone. Maybe this is the place for you. Semi-intelligent book discussion, without people looking down on you!


    So, there it is, ladies and germs. I'd say the split will be 75% video games, 25% books (I'm a slow reader, coupled with my finite amount of time per day I get to read). Hopefully, if any real person reads any of this, they'll enjoy it. My first post under the new format will be for a SNES game called Phantom 2040. I'm not sure when it will be up, but I'd like something to be up by the holiday weekend. See you all there!


Monday, May 19, 2014

Boss Stats and Numbers

Get ready for grade-level arithmetic!

    I died a lot in Dark Souls II over 112+ hours between two characters. Specifically (for the purpose of this blog), I died a lot on bosses too. I'm going to break down some simple numbers and go into a bit of depth about how I fared against the thirty (30!) bosses in the game.


    Firstly, my total death count to all the bosses on my initial playthough was 179. 179 over 30 bosses. That is an average of 5.9 deaths per boss (a few high numbers, and few zeroes, really skew the numbers)! That can basically be rounded up to six deaths per boss battles. What other games can you think of where you die an average of SIX TIMES PER BOSS? Imagine if you died six times on every boss in Final Fantasy VII, for instance. You think Dark Souls II has a lot of bosses? That game has probably double the amount, at least (factoring in the sidequest ones too). God, playtime on that game would be outrageous. Imagine if you died six times to all the bosses in ANY turn-based RPG? Yikes.


    My most deaths on any boss was a staggering 21. This happened on two different bosses: Lost Sinner and the Belfry Gargoyles. That's 42 deaths to kill two bosses. I would imagine that that's more than you would die in most other games, altogether. Also, for fun's sake, the boss I died to the most on Dark Souls was (surprise, surprise) Ornstein & Smough. I don't know the number exactly (it was years ago, after all), but I have no doubt that it was in the mid-twenties, at least. A nice note from the here and now, I'm currently playing Dark Souls, going for the platinum for that one (only need two trophies), and I just can. Not. Beat. Gwyn. Ugh. He is another boss from this game that is pretty high on the death list I believe (and to hell with your parrying suggestion. I can't parry). Now, the boss I died to the most in Demon's Souls was probably Flamelurker. Final note about Demon's, I remember easily beating both Fool's Idol and Old King Allant my first time through, and on basically every subsequent playthrough, they both (especially Allant) give me huge problems. Yeah, Fool's Idol. Lame.


    Conversely, I killed five bosses on my first try. These were: Giant Lord, Prowler Magus, Scorpioness Najka, Mytha, Baneful Queen, and Flexile Sentry). In comparison, if memory serves correct, in Dark Souls, I killed Iron Golem, Pinwheel, and I believe Demon Firesage and Centipede Demon on first tries (not 100% on those last two. They were no more than 1 death, for sure). For Demon's Souls, I think the only ones I killed on my first try were Leechmonger and Dirty Colossus. For such brutally tough areas, those guys are pushovers.


     Now, delving into my self-appointed (and only slightly arbitrary) difficulty ratings, we see that the average difficulty rating is an underwhelming 4.6, which would roughly be the difficulty of somewhere between Executioner's Chariot, Pursuer, and Velstadt. No bosses got a 1, a 4.5, or a 10 for their ratings. The highest rating was a 9.5, for only one boss battle (two bosses), that being those pesky Throne defenders. Three bosses got ratings of only 1.5, which would be the lowest (this dubious honor goes to Mytha, the Skeleton Lords, and poor old Magus). Now, a bit of a rant. Not entirely a rant, but I see people all over the forums and message boards I look at, and many people complain the bosses in this game are too easy. Are they really though? Sure, there were definitely some simple ones here, but I think that's more to do with the sheer number of them. I will say, I was dismayed a bit, initially, with the difficulty of some of the bosses. There were enough tough, challenging bosses to ultimately satisfy me, however.
    So let's quickly think back to Demon's and Dark Souls, and the difficulty of their bosses. Now that we've separated ourselves from the games (Demon's is FIVE years old, while Dark is about 2.5 years old), we can truly look back on the games and realize, "eh, there's not many hard bosses in these games either." Case in point: how many really tough bosses are there in Demon's Souls? I would consider tough to be an 8 or above on my difficulty scale. Going in order, starting at 1-1, Old King Allant (probably the hardest in that whole game), Flamelurker, and the Maneaters. Other than that, are any of the bosses worthy of an almighty "8"? Let's start again from the beginning, for a very quick rundown:

  • Phalanx: easy
  • Tower Knight: intimidating at first, but easy
  • Penetrator: medium (unless Biorr is helping, then SUPER easy)
  • Armor Spider: is pretty close to being on that 8+ list, but you can kill him from afar with well-timed dodges, and a hell of a lot of arrows
  • Dragon God: easy
  • Fool's Idol: easy, but can be super annoying (at least for me)
  • Old Monk: if you're fighting the computer (which I assume everyone is at this point): pretty easy. If you're fighting a human, well results may vary. Could very well be the toughest battle in the game
  • Adjudicator: annoying (because of the small area you fight him in), but ultimately easy
  • Old Hero: a joke
  • Storm King: can be annoying as hell, but easy
  • Everything in world 5 is simple
    So, three hard bosses out of all those? Now let's go to the original Dark Souls. Same game: how many tough bosses? Ornstein & Smough (no doubt), Four Kings (even this is very questionable, but I'll include them), and Gwyn (no parrying, anyway). There are some fringe players too (I'm not going through the whole boss roster): Capra Demon (because of that bullshittingly small room) and Sif. I will say, the DLC is no fucking joke. All four of those bosses I'd probably rate at least a 7 (and truly, after Sanctuary Guardian, the final three might be 8.5+). So again, three bosses, with a possible two more.
    Now, what does this mean for Dark Souls II? Well, if anything, that there are as many hard boss battles as in the previous games, but because there are more of them, and they are more spaced out (the hard ones I mean), it seems that there aren't as many.
    Finally, here's a more detailed breakdown difficulty ratings from Dark Souls II (meaning, the number of battles that fall between the specific difficulty rating):

0 - 2.5:   9
3 - 5.5:   9
6 - 8:     7
8.5 - 10: 5


    I think that's all I can squeeze out of difficulty ratings. I think that's it anyways. So, what have we learned, exactly? I love these games too damn much. Really, there is no other conclusion that can be drawn. Why put so much work into something like this? It's a labor of love, and it was a blast to put together. I love writing (even if I don't "blog" like a pro. I'm sure my paragraph structure and order is not optimized, and I'm sure the tense of most of my writing is out of whack. Sit on it, Potsie!), and I love these (and many other) games.



     At first, I was going to say I was going to have one final Souls post, that would rank all the bosses from all the games, but as I've been compiling this list, I realized it was a fool's errand. It's very difficult to rank 73 bosses in an honest, complete way. Meaning, how much of a difference is there really, between numbers 56 and 57? It all comes down to arbitrary minutia. So, I'm not going to make the list. Perhaps one day I'll do a top ten list. So, sorry if you're disappointed (you aren't trust me). Stay tuned for what's coming on this (ever-evolving) blog!